On Jun 6, 2004, at 4:00 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> At 3:11 PM -0400 6/6/04, John Cowan wrote:
>
>> Walter Perry, are you listening? Your Fichte has been found!
>
> I have no idea who Fichte is/was, or what his/her relevance is here,
As a little experiment to test the power of Google vs the Semantic Web
and analogy vs deduction <grin>, let me guess:
Harold is to Perry as " Fichte is to Kant what Euclid-Plato is to
Socrates, and to Spinoza what Euclid-Plato is to Parmenides."
http://www.class.uidaho.edu/mickelsen/texts/Weber%20-%20History/
fichte.htm.
- References:
- RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: "Howard Katz" <howardk@f...>
- RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: John Cowan <cowan@c...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
|