• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?
• From: Frank Richards <frank@t...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:04:34 -0400
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F96F@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F96F@h...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

On Thursday 24 June 2004 10:56, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>  In the recent article cited from Chaitin,
> he noted how in a hundred years, theories would
> emerge that would take only a few pages to
> describe because the terminology would evolve
> to the point that fewer terms are necessary
> and so what was once complicated to explain
> would be simple.  Is this an advance in
> terminology or in understanding?

'Yes.' With understanding comes the ability to coin the elegant terminology,
to describe the elegant design which also requires the understanding to 
create.

Frank

• References:
  • RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• Next by Date: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?
• Next by thread: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread