Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...> writes:
> I believe you found the cause in your explanation below - the
> restriction is not actually a restriction. You would have to - for
> example - change one of the maxOccurs facets from "unbounded" to "5" (or
> anything other than "unbounded").
Sorry, that's not a problem -- vacuous restriction is allowed. I
don't know the details of the validator involved, but I would guess
that the problem is that you're using anonymous type definitions --
W3C XML Schema requires the type definition of an element in a restriction to be
the same as or derived from the type definition of the corresponding
element, and it only _guarantees_ identity for type definitions with
names. So move that anonymous definition up to the top level, give it
a name, and refer to it _by_ name, i.e.
<xsd:element name="FirstElement" type="myChoiceType"/>
in both base and restriction, and you should win.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
