• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:15:37 +0100
• In-reply-to: <40D6D10F.8010705@e...>
• References: <20040620080246.RJLE21846.mta08-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle> <40D6D10F.8010705@e...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520

[not xposted to jsr-225-comments@j...]


Burak Emir wrote:

> But I am not argueing against allowing to pass strings.
> 
> My point is that it is more than questionable to use them as the *only* 
> way to pass queries to the XQJ driver (what was called "call-level 
> interface"). This results in the *lack* of a high-level interface which 
> is the real problem. JDBC is a real shame (I hope I am not doing it again).

http://joe.truemesh.com/squiggle/

cheers
Bill

• Follow-Ups:
  • XSquiggle ? Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR225)
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>

• References:
  • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Inheritance in XML
• Next by Date: Re: Inheritance in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• Next by thread: XSquiggle ? Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR225)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread