• To: 'Joshua Allen' <joshuaa@m...>, Michael Champion <mc@x...>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:09:00 -0500

Fair enough, Joshua, but now you can tell us how 
the semantic web relates to the raft of current  
technologies.  In other words, what makes a SemWeb 
database more useful than the technologies we are 
using now?  Where will it take us today?  What will 
we implement that we aren't already implementing?

len


From: Joshua Allen [mailto:joshuaa@m...]

Google is to "the semantic web" as CompuServe was to "the web".

• Prev by Date: RE: An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide
• Next by Date: RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Previous by thread: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [x ml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Next by thread: RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread