• To: <martind@n...>,"Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>,"Michael Champion" <mc@x...>,"XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 08:42:14 -0700
• Thread-index: AcROHe/LZ+pXWZKURDSM9pow5X8DVgAGi29w
• Thread-topic: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)

> Can we say that if the "about" attribute in an rdf:description refers
to a
> resource we can get, see with a viewer (for instance a web browser) or
> process with a gizmo, that we are talking of meta-data. If not, we are
> probably talking about data.

No, absolutely not!!  This is an understandable error, but please do not
propagate it.  A resource is a resource is a resource.  Doesn't matter
whether you can get it or not.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing)
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
• Next by Date: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Previous by thread: RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Next by thread: RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread