• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>,
• Subject: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:20:26 +0100
• Cc: XML Developer List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <p06010213bceaa22827fd@[192.168.254.88]>
• References: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOKEAAEMAA.howardk@f...><p06010208bce75195c8e6@[192.168.254.88]><40c9aa34.248723415@s...><p0601020dbce76af8bfc8@[192.168.254.88]><40C243E6.9060602@a...><1086511960.3929.23.camel@l...><p06010206bce8a5118be2@[192.168.254.88]><40C31EFC.2090203@k...><p06010202bce8dc0073d2@[192.168.254.88]><40C33FD3.3050308@c...><40C35952.1080209@k...><40C36038.6020900@c...><1086642052.3611.17.camel@l...><p06010213bceaa22827fd@[192.168.254.88]>

At 23:57 07/06/2004, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

>Why not? Have you tried it and watched it fail? If so, please do elaborate 
>on your experience. If you'd like I can probably get you a slot at SD 2005 
>West to talk about it. (They love case studies.) But like extreme 
>programming, nobody believes this approach can possibly work, until they 
>try it and see that it does. And then they can hardly believe they ever 
>did it any other way.

How come I get the feeling you've had such a success recently? :-)
If so:
   How long has it lasted,
   How many variants have you met in how many 'incomings' (% )
   How much work was involved in each variant? (man days)

regards DaveP

• References:
  • RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Howard Katz" <howardk@f...>
  • RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The triples datamodel
• Next by Date: RE: The triples datamodel
• Previous by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Next by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread