At 8:33 PM +0100 6/6/04, Dave Pawson wrote:
>>Absolutely not. The fact is computers aren't that smart, and robust
>>systems allow and prepare for human intervention. In practice, most
>>debugged and deployed systems rarely require human intervention of
>>this sort.
>
>I've not met many such perfect systems.
The systems don't need to be perfect.That's why I wrote "rarely"
instead of "never". Pretty much all systems do require intervention
of this sort, but rarely. The vast majority of transactions go
through without a hitch. It's only the rare one that needs manual
assistance.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@m...
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
- References:
- RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: "Howard Katz" <howardk@f...>
- RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
- Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
- From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
|
Cart
