• To: "Michael Champion" <mc@x...>,"XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:48:10 -0700
• Thread-index: AcRJE1kYCcW7IdAvRiqlL0JUUweZsAAEkxaw
• Thread-topic: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)

> > strips it down to the basic necessary parts and succeeds wildly.  
> > Google is succeeding wildly based on what humans need.  What humans 

Google is to "the semantic web" as CompuServe was to "the web".

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Next by Date: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Previous by thread: RE: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing?
• Next by thread: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread