• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
• From: "William J. Kammerer" <wkammerer@n...>
• Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 13:02:54 -0400
• Organization: Novannet, LLC. Columbus, US-OH
• References: <20040502164439.EWMB8163.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>

Ahh... the beauty of standards.  There's only one way to interpret ISO
8601 dates. 2004-02-05 unambiguously means "5th February."

William J. Kammerer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
To: "'K. Ari Krupnikov'" <ari@c...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Sunday, 02 May, 2004 12:46 PM
Subject: RE:  ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was
Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)


> Should we call the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency
> /Unamerican/?
>
> https://164.214.2.62/dafif/dafif_0405_ed7/docs/ed8/ddd/datacov.doc
>
> I'm not sure they use the term DD in /quite/ the same way you do
> though.
>

Their site appears to have a security certificate that expired on 5th
February, or possibly 2nd May.

Michael Kay

• References:
  • RE: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
• Next by Date: Re: "Standards Business Technology" development effort required? (was RE: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer(was Re: [xml-d ev] You call that a standard?))
• Previous by thread: RE: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re:[xml-d ev] You call that a standard?)
• Next by thread: Re: ISO and the Standards Golden Hammer (was Re: You call that a standard?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread