Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
There are few if any clearly and only technical decisions. Some intersection of social systems is at work. Not understanding that or accepting the necessity of the politics of negotiation is at the root of much predatory behavior by intension. If the pickers are independent of the lots, then sequential processing is possibly not a descriptive process. What one should see is independent pickers independently assessing the state of the lot, and the state of other pickers on the lot. How do they negotiate conflict with other pickers? It would be the emergence of that feature that would simulate 'evolution' of the information. len - From: Jeff Rafter [mailto:lists@j...] Many of the decisions we have faced are less technical and more business oriented. All the same, I wanted to pat you on the back for building up those documents-- they have given us an invaluable set of base definitions. >>Actually, each Picker makes it decisions locally, by looking at neighboring lots. There is no top-down code telling each Picker how to move. It is a bottom-up approach to the Vineyard system. This is for an "XML and Complex System's" tutorial that I am putting together. <<
|
