• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: SAX and Entity Literals containing content
• From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 19:13:07 -0400
• References: <030f01c44266$1252f320$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA> <p06010202bcd91e1e005e@[192.168.254.88]> <40B3CBE1.8060403@z...>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rick Marshall" <rjm@z...>
To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@m...>
Cc: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 6:42 PM


> so is this perfectly ok?
> 
> <!DOCTYPE doc [
>   <!ENTITY e "<foo>">
> ]>
> <doc>
>   <child>&e;test</foo></child>
> </doc>

No, because the entity is not well-formed, according to
section 4.3.2 in the XML spec.

Karl

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX and Entity Literals containing content
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• References:
  • SAX and Entity Literals containing content
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
  • Re: SAX and Entity Literals containing content
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: SAX and Entity Literals containing content
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX and Entity Literals containing content
• Next by Date: Re: Logical models, hierarchy, network model
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX and Entity Literals containing content
• Next by thread: Re: SAX and Entity Literals containing content
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread