• To: Ed Day <eday@o...>
• Subject: Re: RE: Why a "general" solution?
• From: Olivier Dubuisson <Olivier.Dubuisson@f...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:05:50 +0200
• Cc: 'xml-dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <07a901c422f7$4068c110$4800000a@objsys1>
• Organization: France Telecom R&D
• References: <003201c42258$8bdd0240$650aa8c0@BOBDEV> <1081983903.2460.28.camel@z...> <07a901c422f7$4068c110$4800000a@objsys1>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Ed Day wrote:
> 
> Check out the following links:
> 
> For XSD -> ASN.1 :
> 
> http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/en/tools/xsd2asn1/

This one is an early prototype that was implemented to help develop the 
X.694 standard, so it it not 100% aligned with the approved standard. As 
mentioned by Alessandro Triglia, it will be (very) soon replaced (at the 
same URL) with a tool that complies with ITU-T Rec. X.694. (I will Cc 
this list when it'll be announced.)
-- 
Olivier DUBUISSON
france telecom R&D

DTL/TAL - 22307 Lannion Cedex - France
t: +33 2 96 05 38 50 - f: +33 2 96 05 39 45 - http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/

• References:
  • RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
  • RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
    • From: "Ed Day" <eday@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Fast text output from SAX?
• Next by Date: Re: Fast text output from SAX?
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread