[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


> >Agreed, well-formednes must be checked. But surely it 
> doesn't need to be
> >checked every time a document is parsed (if it is 
> unchanged).
> 
> How do you know no other process or person has modified the field in 
> the mean time?
> 

Why not define a standardized checksum, that can be included in the XML
declaration, e.g.

<?xml version="1.2" checksum="08bd37f1"?>

with the rules:

(a) nothing other than a parser that checks well-formedness may generate a
checksum

(b) at user option, a parser may skip some or all well-formedness checks if
a checksum is present and correct?

A user who doesn't trust the originator of the XML should still check for
well-formedness.

I personally don't think that XML parsing is that time-critical to most
applications, but I can imagine that there are applications where avoiding
the cost of repeatedly checking (for example) that every name is made up of
valid characters would be beneficial.

Michael Kay


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member