• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:48:08 +0100
• Cc: Alessandro Triglia <sandro@m...>, "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <407D94EC.1050404@d...> (Rich Salz's message of "Wed,14 Apr 2004 15:45:48 -0400")
• References: <005601c42256$753f6fc0$0e00a8c0@aldebaran><407D94EC.1050404@d...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, linux)

The W3C XML Schema Working Group is considering a proposal to add a
datatype to the next version of W3C XML Schema which would distinguish
e.g. 3.0 from 3.00 _as values_.  Reasoned statements of support or
disagreement would be very welcome on www-xml-schema-comments@w...

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>

• References:
  • RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
  • Re: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Next by Date: Another way to optimize XML
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread