• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>,"'Jim Rankin'" <jimbokun_lists@m...>,<rjm@z...>
• Subject: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>
• Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 23:10:26 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F5C2@h...>

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Rankin [mailto:jimbokun_lists@m...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:32 PM
To: rjm@z...
Cc: xml-dev@l... DEV
Subject: Re: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?

On Apr 5, 2004, at 5:53 PM, Rick Marshall wrote:

simple things are good. they can

be understood, implemented, and used in the lifetime of a human being.

complex things are of no use because they can't.

I just added this to my signatures list.

-jimbo

Excelsior! XML Marshaller for Cocoa

http://www.homepage.mac.com/jimbokun/Excelsior.html

• References:
  • RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Next by Date: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Previous by thread: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Next by thread: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread