• To: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>,"Liam Quin" <liam@w...>
• Subject: RE: The "what is XML" permathread revisited -- was Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:04:14 -0700
• Cc: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@d...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcQhgIVvuwJhsPAfQuWHa0tOYSh7CwAARDaQ
• Thread-topic: The "what is XML" permathread revisited -- was Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen D. Williams [mailto:sdw@l...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:44 AM
> To: Liam Quin
> Cc: Rich Salz; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  The "what is XML" permathread 
> revisited -- was Re:  XML Binary Characterization WG 
> public list availabl e
> 
> I would also note that every element can have it's own 
> encoding.  This meshes perfectly with my plan to support 
> whatever encoding is used for text in a particular element, 
> individually for each element.  

I've never heard that XML allows every element to have its own encoding,
in fact I'm pretty sure it explicitly disallows it. 

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Those who fail in life often follow the path of least persistence.     

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The "what is XML" permathread revisited -- was Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
    • From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
• Next by Date: Schema vs Schema-free (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl)
• Previous by thread: TeXML, the XML vocabulary for TeX
• Next by thread: Re: The "what is XML" permathread revisited -- was Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread