[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Jonathan Borden wrote:
> I suppose that if you are simply looking to use nature and purpose you
> can simply use rddl:nature and rddl:purpose as a simple vocabulary.
> Indeed take a look at RDDL2: http://www.rddl.org/rddl2

> Eric Hanson wrote:
>> I like RDDL as a starting place, but maybe what I'd like to see
>> is some kind of sister spec for non-human-readable RDDL.

Speaking of RDDL2: What was the reason for abandoning XLink?

I'm curious because the first thing that came to my mind when reading about
Typekit was that it's basically - in XLink terms - an extended, third-party
linkbase.

Regards,

Andreas Sewe


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member