[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jonathan Borden wrote: > I suppose that if you are simply looking to use nature and purpose you > can simply use rddl:nature and rddl:purpose as a simple vocabulary. > Indeed take a look at RDDL2: http://www.rddl.org/rddl2 > Eric Hanson wrote: >> I like RDDL as a starting place, but maybe what I'd like to see >> is some kind of sister spec for non-human-readable RDDL. Speaking of RDDL2: What was the reason for abandoning XLink? I'm curious because the first thing that came to my mind when reading about Typekit was that it's basically - in XLink terms - an extended, third-party linkbase. Regards, Andreas Sewe
|

Cart



