Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 18:25, Tim Bray wrote: > > Right, but I thought the whole X.694 idea was that because you knew the > schema you could encode character data that was representing numbers > super-efficiently and represent the tags as small integers; thus the > saving. So does X.finf actually give you that much of a saving? -Tim Yes, but of course not us much as using a schema-based approach. Our preliminary numbers show a performance improvement similar to other related technologies such as Dennis S. XBIS --BTW, even though type information for numeric data cannot be used, qnames and repeated content can still be encoded as small ints without altering the infoset. -- Santiago This is a digitally signed message part
|
