• To: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Subject: Re: xmlns-uris and namespaces.html
• From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:53:43 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., sax-devel@l...
• In-reply-to: <018601c427bb$c1fcbbf0$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>
• References: <OFDD24500E.63732F3B-ON85256E7C.0078ADEF@c...> <4085BD5B.8070202@a...> <002101c42737$b5e22dc0$0200a8c0@karlglen188> <018601c427bb$c1fcbbf0$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5

Jeff Rafter wrote:

> It loks like the namespaces.html document was patched, but there is still
> one line that is possibly incorrect: it is in the bullet list "If namespaces
> is true and namespace-prefixes is true, then a SAX2 XML reader will report
> the following:"

Can anyone give a good reason why the docs/ subdirectory should not be 
removed, since the information is duplicated in package.html?  If no one has 
a good argument, I'll remove it tomorrow before I package the prerelease.


All the best,


David

• References:
  • Re: SAX 2.0.2--progress stalled?
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
  • Re: Re: SAX 2.0.2--progress stalled?
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
  • xmlns-uris and namespaces.html
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTD parameter entities
• Next by Date: Re: When to design an attribute in a namespace?
• Previous by thread: xmlns-uris and namespaces.html
• Next by thread: XPath expression
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread