• To: 'Norman Gray' <norman@a...>, Mike Fitzgerald <mikefz@w...>
• Subject: RE: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:20:20 -0500
• Cc: 'xml-dev' <xml-dev@l...>

First it is 'just for the human'; then it is, 
'why can't we make the wire more efficient', 
then, 'humans don't read this anyway because 
we have tools for that'.

It's just more stuff.

len


From: Norman Gray [mailto:norman@a...]

Separating processors from syntax is why SAX is a Good Thing.

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH]: A couple fixes to org/xml/sax/package.html
• Next by Date: Re: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hardfor Aunt Trudie?
• Previous by thread: RE: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
• Next by thread: RE: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread