• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: Fast text output from SAX?
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 09:40:22 -0700
• Cc: "XML DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F63D@h...>

> Now we are introducing a
> need-to-know-the-need-to-know  (NTKTNTK),
> or 'nyuk! nyuk!'.  Could be comedic.

Not at all, we are simply introducing one rule into the hypothetical
framework or database:
when-updating-write-only-wellformed-output-without-option (WUWOWOWO) or 'woo
woo woo woo!', then any framework component can read from the repository
without rechecking wellformedness. Of course, Michael Kay's suggestion is
more robust and demonstrates safety precautions that could be inserted.

Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

• References:
  • RE: Fast text output from SAX?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Next by Date: RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Previous by thread: RE: Fast text output from SAX?
• Next by thread: RE: Fast text output from SAX?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread