• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 06 Apr 2004 16:49:12 -0700
• In-reply-to: <4072A4C0.8010504@a...>
• References: <40716EFF.4050405@a...> <407182A3.5090502@o...><40729C26.1080806@c...> <4072A4C0.8010504@a...>
• Sender: ari@f...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

David Megginson <dmeggin@a...> writes:

> Java objects have an awful lot of built-in
> memory overhead just for the java.lang.Object base class

Do you know how much memory you actually use for a "new Object()"?

Ari.

-- 
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• References:
  • Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
  • Re: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
  • Re: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
    • From: Mark Schmeets <mark@c...>
  • Re: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>

• Prev by Date: Can anyURI be empty?
• Next by Date: Re: XML question - reference points
• Previous by thread: Re: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
• Next by thread: Re: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread