• To: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
• Subject: Re: hashing
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:03:49 -0700
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <40916503.9080001@a...>
• References: <20040429195817.E62427@a...><40916503.9080001@a...>
• Sender: Tim.Bray@S...

On Apr 29, 2004, at 1:26 PM, David Megginson wrote:

> The quick-and-dirty approach would be to run all of them through an 
> XML normalizer (such as any SAX parser hooked up to XML-Writer).

Or, put it in canonical-XML format, e.g. with Tolpin's XG (and I'm sure 
there's a Java equivalent) and then follow David's recommendations. 
-Tim

• References:
  • hashing
    • From: Eric Hanson <eric@a...>
  • Re: hashing
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: hashing
• Next by Date: Re: hashing
• Previous by thread: Re: hashing
• Next by thread: Re: hashing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread