• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: xpath: which is right?
• From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@y...>
• Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 13:09:18 +0200
• References: <39CA7AD8-859A-11D8-9E28-000A95CDF1FE@i...> <406F245D.1090602@o...> <c4om3p$odc$1@s...> <B4B6FCEE-8623-11D8-9E28-000A95CDF1FE@i...>
• Sender: news <news@s...>

> itym XML::XPath is wrong then as it is the one which uses document
> order, as opposed to libxslt which uses reversed document order.
>
> groetjes, su.

Correct, when responding to Bob Foster I just used his statement about it
being libxslt.

Good to know it was not libxslt but XML::XPath

Cheers,

Dimitre Novatchev,
FXSL developer,

http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL
Resume: http://fxsl.sf.net/DNovatchev/Resume/Res.html

• References:
  • xpath: which is right?
    • From: Suzan Foster <su@i...>
  • Re: xpath: which is right?
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
  • Re: xpath: which is right?
    • From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@y...>
  • Re: Re: xpath: which is right?
    • From: Suzan Foster <su@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: xpath: which is right?
• Next by Date: RE: WS-Emperor naked?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: xpath: which is right?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: xpath: which is right?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread