• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: DTD parameter entities
• From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
• Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:30:43 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <008101c42885$8b14bcd0$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>This would be well-formed, but not valid, I believe:
>  <!%ATTLIST; %ELEMNAME;%ATTNAME; CDATA #FIXED "value"%CLOSE;
>since now the references are not in the position of a DeclSep.

>What sense would that difference make?

No sense, it's just because BNF works forwards.

If you wrote a BNF for backwards-XML, ;ESOLC% would be in a peSlceD
and < would not :-)

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: DTD parameter entities
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTD parameter entities
• Next by Date: Re: Readable syntaxes (was: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online)
• Previous by thread: Re: DTD parameter entities
• Next by thread: Re: DTD parameter entities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread