• To: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>
• Subject: Re: RE: Why a "general" solution?
• From: Olivier Dubuisson <Olivier.Dubuisson@f...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:11:50 +0200
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <407EA89F.3060906@l...>
• Organization: France Telecom R&D
• References: <003201c42258$8bdd0240$650aa8c0@BOBDEV> <1081983903.2460.28.camel@z...> <07a901c422f7$4068c110$4800000a@objsys1> <407EA89F.3060906@l...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Stephen D. Williams wrote:

> What about a free ASN.1 to PER and back set of tools?

There is a long list of ASN.1 tools (some of which being free) at:
http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/links/#tools

There is also a list of PER tools at
http://asn1.rd.francetelecom.fr/en/links/per.htm
but I don't claim that this list is exhaustive.
-- 
Olivier DUBUISSON
france telecom R&D

DTL/TAL - 22307 Lannion Cedex - France
t: +33 2 96 05 38 50 - f: +33 2 96 05 39 45 - http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: Why a "general" solution?
    • From: Olivier Dubuisson <Olivier.Dubuisson@f...>

• References:
  • RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>
  • RE: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
    • From: "Ed Day" <eday@o...>
  • Re: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XMLBinary Characterization WG public list available e)
    • From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fast text output from SAX?
• Next by Date: RE: xml editors
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XMLBinary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Next by thread: Re: RE: Why a "general" solution?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread