• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML-appropriate editing data structures
• From: Ari =?utf-8?q?Nordstr=C3=B6m?= <mayfair@t...>
• Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:07:29 +0200
• Cc: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, "'mayfair@t...'" <mayfair@t...>, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>, Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F608@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F608@h...>
• Reply-to: mayfair@t...
• User-agent: KMail/1.6.1

On Friday 09 April 2004 22:58, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:


> That's not to say that all editors have to
> support the rigors of technical writing.
> But some do.  That is likely why Arbortext
> is still in business while SoftQuad isn't.


Oh, SoftQuad's still in business. Sort of. They're owned by Blast Radius these 
days, and XMetaL's alive and well. My personal opinion (as a technical writer 
and as an XML developer) is that XMetaL is a far better product than 
Arbortext Epic, but I'm aware that Epic has its supporters as well.

Best,

/Ari

• References:
  • RE: XML-appropriate editing data structures
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-appropriate editing data structures
• Next by Date: Re: XML-appropriate editing data structures
• Previous by thread: RE: XML-appropriate editing data structures
• Next by thread: RE: XML-appropriate editing data structures
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread