• To: Paul Sumner Downey <Paul.Downey@w...>
• Subject: Re: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:00:18 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <AKEALCBHGNKMENPPPGFFMEPFCOAA.Paul.Downey@w...>
• References: <AKEALCBHGNKMENPPPGFFMEPFCOAA.Paul.Downey@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> I don't think all of these WS-* specs *are* composable.

Why do you say that?  We have customers using WS-Security, and some of 
the tokens they define, without using other things.  We've done demo's 
using WS-Routing/addressing, etc.  Have you found issues, or is this 
just gut feeling based on your experiences?

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
    • From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>

• References:
  • RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
    • From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Converting data to XML
• Next by Date: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Previous by thread: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Next by thread: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread