• To: 'Michael Champion' <mc@x...>
• Subject: RE: ADMINISTRIVIA: Re: Toward an controlled vocabulary for "XML" and related terms? - was Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:01:26 -0500
• Cc: 'xml-dev' <xml-dev@l...>

FutureBrowsers.com:  When the speed of light just ain't fast enough.

:-)

I use XML documents/instances, XML application languages, and 
XML systems as my upper level ontology for a controlled vocabulary. 
In this, the binary/optimizedThingie is not XML, but it can be 
used among consenting XML systems.  I don't use XML to mean everything 
that can work with an XML system.

In other words, it can't require XML to change to meet its requirements 
because that perturbates a lot of systems that may not want it.  It 
can have its own requirements.  Interop might be one of them.

len


From: Michael Champion [mailto:mc@x...]


Sorry for the duplicate content ... I sent this yesterday, never saw 
it, and figured it was lost forever, and recyled some of it in my reply 
to another message.  24 hours later it shows up ....

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
• Next by Date: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
• Previous by thread: SAX and xmlns-uris
• Next by thread: [ANN] New Offsite XML Patterns List at XMLPatterns.com
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread