[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 9:47 AM -0500 3/17/04, David Megginson wrote: >a) an attribute with no Namespace URI and the local name "xmlns"; > >b) an attribute with the Namespace URI >"http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/" and no local name; or > >c) an attribute with the Namespace URI >"http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/" and the local name "xmlns". > >Note that none of these is a clean solution, probably because >Namespaces 1.1 is a bit broken. Then again, I doubt it matters >much. If no one presents a convincing argument, I'll just pick one >of the three at random. Agreed except for picking one at random. I prefer option c when the xmlns-uris feature is true; option a when xmlns-uris is false. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
|

Cart



