• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:35:36 +0100
• Cc: 'XML DEV' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F435@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F435@h...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> BTW:  because it started the thread(s), 
> I can see how one could dispose of HTML 
> and not miss it, but I can't think of why
> one wouldn't keep CSS.  The visual formatting 
> model is a good one for most cases except 3D 
> and I guess one could extend it's positioning 
> model for that.

It's not good for SVG either. SVG doesn't use all the box model (which 
is indeed very nice for the sort of document that it's aimed at).

-- 
Robin Berjon

• References:
  • RE: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Next by Date: RE: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Previous by thread: RE: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread