• To: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Subject: Re: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:59:37 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <404733A9.2060804@k...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F41E@h...> <40465CA0.8020202@k...> <40472275.7020500@e...> <404733A9.2060804@k...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Robert Koberg wrote:
> Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Baaaaah. Matching prefixes instead of namespaces. Bad bad bad. You 
>> ought to declare the namespace with an @namespace rule, and then use 
>> pfx|localName.
> 
> right... can you tell me which browser supports this?

Anything reasonably up to date. Mozilla and Safari come to mind.

> reality -- it's such a problem

Which is why there's a point in doing one's best to fix it. Slow but 
steady eradication of IE would help make the Web interesting again.

-- 
Robin Berjon

• References:
  • CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The myth of 80/20
• Next by Date: Re: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread