[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 18:11, Robert Koberg wrote:
> Eric van der Vlist wrote:
>
> > Maybe they are carefully hidden in the member's section, but I have
> > never seen a cost analysis for a W3C (or any other competing standard
> > organisation) decision made in the name of the mythic 80/20 rule...
> 
> the easier it is to make money from some tool, the faster the adoption 
> of that tool
> 
> do you disagree?

I don't know (I have never been good at making money), but I don't see
how that relates to the mis-usage of the 80/20 to accept or reject
technical feature requests without any cost and market analysis.

But never mind...

Eric
-- 
Carnet web :
           http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog?t=category&a=Fran%C3%A7ais
Upcoming XML schema languages tutorial:
 - Santa Clara  -half day- (15/03/2004)        http://masl.to/?J24916E96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG   ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member