• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Document is invalid: no grammar found
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:52:01 +0100
• In-reply-to: <406769F7.3020603@c...>
• References: <20040328234652.8E03F9F991@m...><406769F7.3020603@c...>

At 01:12 29/03/2004, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
>Except that on Windows, a file path beginning with a drive letter and a 
>":" is well-known to indicate an absolute path.  Some processors kindly 
>make use of this knowledge (like Spy), and some do not (which both of us 
>appear to agree is rfc-correct behavior)

Its basically a processor dependent result IMHO.
I tested a few combinations
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect4/uriIncl.html
with a few xslt processors.

regards DaveP

• References:
  • Re: Document is invalid: no grammar found
    • From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
  • Re: Document is invalid: no grammar found
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Document is invalid: no grammar found
• Next by Date: Re: How to use SAX to validate XML against a schema?
• Previous by thread: Re: Document is invalid: no grammar found
• Next by thread: Re: Document is invalid: no grammar found
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread