• To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
• From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@w...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:24:25 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <5442CD5A-764A-11D8-BF21-000A95A51C9E@t...>

Heh, and given canonicalisation is one of the simplest components of
encrypting and signing XML, when can we expect to have *interoperable* WSS
(WS-Security) implementations ?

Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]
Sent: 15 March 2004 06:31
To: xml-dev@l... DEV
Subject:  Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong


Canonicalizing XML is hard!  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: EditiX XML / XSLT Editor v1.2
• Next by Date: Impact of the usage of unique identifier as URN into XML documents
• Previous by thread: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
• Next by thread: RE: Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread