Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Mike Fitzgerald wrote: > Bob Foster wrote: > >> Where did the "http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/" URI come from? The >> Namespaces In XML spec specifically says: "The prefix xmlns is used >> only for namespace bindings and is not itself bound to any namespace >> name." >> Am I missing some errata, or is there some complexity-multiplying >> going on here? It sure seems like a SAX feature that should be dropped >> should not be used to justify contradicting the namespaces >> recommendation. > > > Dereference http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/ for some clues. I may be clueless, but I knew enough to do that. That's why I reread the recommendation. Bob
|
