• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Subject: Re: schematron rules anormal behavior (off-topic)
• From: Pedro Salazar <pedro-b-salazar@p...>
• Date: 04 Mar 2004 19:03:52 +0000
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1078425739.24516.193.camel@delleric>
• Organization: Portugal Telecom Inovação, S.A.
• References: <1078425336.18291.19.camel@v...> <1078425739.24516.193.camel@delleric>

On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 18:42, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Yes, and it's not anormal but conform to the specification :) ...
> 
> For each node and each pattern, the rules are evaluated in the order in
> which they appear in the Schematron schema and this evaluation stops
> after the first matching rule.
> 

duh :-) 

I overlap that specification part, and I assumed patterns were only sets
of rules without any "order-and-return-if-ok" behavior.

> Hope that helps.
> 
> Eric
> 

Believe me: it really helped! :-)

1 million thanks!!

regards,
-- 
-PS

• References:
  • schematron rules anormal behavior (off-topic)
    • From: Pedro Salazar <pedro-b-salazar@p...>
  • Re: schematron rules anormal behavior (off-topic)
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The myth of 80/20
• Next by Date: Re: Extreme Specwriting - was Re: The myth of80/20]
• Previous by thread: Re: schematron rules anormal behavior (off-topic)
• Next by thread: Re: Extreme Specwriting - was Re: The myth of80/20]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread