• Subject: Re: ns 1.1
• From: Mike Fitzgerald <mikefz@w...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:14:40 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20040323222454.716B49BE0D@m...>
• References: <20040323222454.716B49BE0D@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Thanks to all who responded on this issue.

Namespaces 1.1 is unique at W3C, I think, in being an uptick of a spec that 
serves one other uptick of a spec, XML 1.1. Or are there other examples of this?

Mike

• References:
  • Re: ns 1.1
    • From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)

• Prev by Date: problems getting the value of a float with XSD
• Next by Date: Re: Another published schema broken by XML Schema erratachange
• Previous by thread: Re: Another published schema broken by XML Schema erratachange
• Next by thread: ANNOUNCE: XML Europe 2004 to Focus on "Documenting the Future"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread