• To: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
• Subject: Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:57:45 -0500
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>,SAX Developers' List <sax-devel@l...>
• In-reply-to: <40488A7C.90003@a...>
• References: <40488A7C.90003@a...>

Could you expand on this a little? Either here or on a web page? 
Aside from the change to allow endDocument not to be called, these 
sound reasonable; but I'd like to see the specific feature names and 
text you're proposing. Even if the changes are basically good, there 
might be editorial fixes or clarifications that should be made. 
Thanks.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA

• References:
  • SAX/Java Proposed Changes
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
• Next by Date: Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
• Next by thread: Missing features in CVS?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread