• To: Simon Fell <xml@z...>
• Subject: Re: GenX and attribute QNames
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:29:52 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <404F5558.5050902@z...>
• References: <404F5558.5050902@z...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

Hi Simon!

> Othen than pointing out how evil QNames in content are, anyone have any 
> suggestions on how these things might be incorporated into the API 
> without breaking the canonicalization ?

Outputting an extra namespace won't break the canonicalization as long 
as you only add the namespace declaration once.

If Tim provided an API that allowed you to add namespace nodes to the 
root, then that would be safe.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: GenX and attribute QNames
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • GenX and attribute QNames
    • From: Simon Fell <xml@z...>

• Prev by Date: GenX and attribute QNames
• Next by Date: Re: SAX CVS
• Previous by thread: GenX and attribute QNames
• Next by thread: Re: GenX and attribute QNames
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread