• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Proposed genx changes
• From: Simon Fell <xml@z...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:18:33 -0800
• In-reply-to: <97875058-73A9-11D8-A512-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• Organization: pocketsoap.com
• References: <97875058-73A9-11D8-A512-000A95A51C9E@t...>

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:15:23 -0800, in xml you wrote:

>OK, I got C14n wrong (ERH has given me a test suite so it won't happen 
>again).  Here's how I'm thinking I'm going to change Genx to do the 
>right thing.
....
>Anyone have a better idea?  Simon Fell, would this address your issues? 
>-Tim

Looks great, addresses all my issues.

Thanks !
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com

• References:
  • Proposed genx changes
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: GenX and attribute QNames
• Next by Date: RE: Citations (WAS RE: W3C suckered by Micros oft?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Proposed genx changes
• Next by thread: Re: Proposed genx changes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread