• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Current status of XLink
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 27 Mar 2004 02:40:58 -0800
• In-reply-to: <20040326133602.NKPB325.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>
• References: <20040326133602.NKPB325.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>
• Sender: ari@f...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

"Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...> writes:

> In my view the mess is because XLink simply doesn't fit into the layering of
> the XML architecture. The whole point of XML is that you can choose any
> names you like for your objects and attributes, and give them any semantics
> that you like (typically captured in schemas and stylesheets).

What I miss most in CSS is a property that would turn an element into
a link. Something that would make it possible to replicate a/href only
on arbitrary elements/attributes, or even on character content.

<as-in>more information at <link>http://example.com</link></as-in>

Ari.

-- 
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.

• References:
  • RE: Current status of XLink
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Service-Oriented Architecture & Web Services
• Next by Date: at least one element in XDR Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: Current status of XLink
• Next by thread: RE: Current status of XLink
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread