• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: Citations (WAS RE: W3C suckered by Micros oft?)
• From: infom@b...
• Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:55:34 +0200 (EET)
• Cc: "'infom@b...'" <infom@b...>,xml-dev@l...
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F480@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F480@h...>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1

> Something like that.
>
> How discriminating does one want to be when
> mixing one's own genes?

The question should be - how good is one in doing it, predicting and
controlling what happens.

Too good that culture is much more difficult to dissect.

Kremena


>
> len
>
>
> From: infom@b... [mailto:infom@b...]
>
>> A job for the semantic web?
>>
>> len
>
> I looked up Memes in babylon.com, one of the definitions saying "Memes are
> the cultural equivalent of genes". Does it mean the semantic web will be
> alive and mutating, with search engines acting as mutagens?
>
> Kremena
>

• References:
  • RE: Citations (WAS RE: W3C suckered by Micros oft?)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Unicode bi-directional algorithm in XSL
• Next by Date: RE: Citations (WAS RE: W3C suckered by Micros oft?)
• Previous by thread: RE: Citations (WAS RE: W3C suckered by Micros oft?)
• Next by thread: Unicode bi-directional algorithm in XSL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread