• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>, sax-devel-request@l...
• Subject: SAX CVS
• From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:27:10 -0500
• In-reply-to: <p06010202bc74908eabfd@[192.168.254.4]>
• References: <1078627030.23151.ezmlm@l...> <404B5CA1.7070000@i...> <p06010203bc71316af8e7@[192.168.254.4]> <404CD7D4.90106@i...> <p06010215bc72919abd26@[192.168.254.4]> <1078817752.404d73d87cb85@w...> <p06010201bc737da03f20@[192.168.254.4]> <1078865346.404e2dc2917e4@w...> <p0601020dbc743ccc2999@[192.168.254.4]> <1078903115.404ec14b652b6@w...> <p06010202bc74908eabfd@[192.168.254.4]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1

Should I assume, from everyone's silence since my postings to XML-DEV Monday 
and Tuesday, that the changes I checked into the SAX CVS are acceptable to 
everyone?


All the best,


David

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX CVS
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: SAX CVS
    • From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
  • Re: SAX CVS
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
    • From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>
  • Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
    • From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>
  • Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C suckered by Microsoft?
• Next by Date: Re: Document is invalid: no grammar found.
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX/Java Proposed Changes
• Next by thread: Re: SAX CVS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread