• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: semantics in schema (xsd)
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 03 Mar 2004 14:32:50 -0800
• In-reply-to: <403F82AA.2030301@a...>
• References: <002201c3fd4f$5916b550$0201a8c0@IRENE><403F82AA.2030301@a...>
• Sender: ari@f...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

David Megginson <dmeggin@a...> writes:

> I'd say forget about classes and make your objects big bags of properties (attributes and relationships).

>   There exists an entity A.
>   A is human.
>   A is male.
>   A is married to B.
>   A is a biological parent of C.

Ahh... Imagine what that would do to the Prolog-101 canMarry(A,B)

-- 
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX - endDocument() confusion again
• Next by Date: Re: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Previous by thread: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: CSS Scoping in XML Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread