• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Extra headaches of securing XML
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:56:27 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D5195F@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D5195F@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Agreed, there are [some] security concerns with XML 1.0 itself but
> these pale on consideration to poor security in applications that are
> built on XML as the interchange format.

Agreed.  I should have mentioned that my list was in "increasing order 
of concern."

	/r$


-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • RE: Extra headaches of securing XML
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: store xml in data structure
• Next by Date: RE: Extra headaches of securing XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Extra headaches of securing XML
• Next by thread: RE: Extra headaches of securing XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread