• To: <jonathan@o...>
• Subject: Re: RDDL: Can we add a 'copyright' version
• From: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@d...>
• Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:01:13 +0100 (CET)
• Cc: <clbullar@i...>, <xml-dev@l...>, <vdv@d...>
• In-reply-to: <BE261A3C-6563-11D8-9E31-000A95BA5A2C@o...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F3A1@h...> <BE261A3C-6563-11D8-9E31-000A95BA5A2C@o...>

Jonathan Borden said:

> I assume that Eric wants a well known RDDL purpose to use in documents
> that he is authoring. RDDL purposes are simply URIrefs. The idea is
> that the document pointed to (by href="") has a purpose of "licence" or
>  "copyright" and a nature of "HTML" or "plain text" or whatever the
> format of the document pointed to is.

Yes, exactly.

Thanks!

Eric

-- 
Freelance consulting and training.
                                            http://dyomedea.com/english/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL: Can we add a 'copyright' version
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL: Can we add a "copyright" version
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL: Can we add a 'copyright' version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread