• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:21:54 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <p06010200bc60fdaf7972@[192.168.254.4]>
• References: <000d01c3fab8$0804e1d0$6401a8c0@pcukmka> <p06010200bc60fdaf7972@[192.168.254.4]>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> However, I also think that the parser should wrap any RuntimeException 
> the application's ContentHandler throws in a SAXException. The parse 
> method should not throw any exception except SAXException and IOException.

An interesting point would be whether a SAXException thrown by
startElement() would be wrapped too (seems to be pointless, but
then...).

J.Pietschmann

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • RE: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • RE: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Coding Makes You Dumb
• Next by Date: Help: Using enumeration that disregards case
• Previous by thread: RE: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Next by thread: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread