• To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Subject: Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:21:40 +0100
• Cc: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <51B8ABCE456FD111899900805F6FD6EE15EDF931@m...>
• References: <51B8ABCE456FD111899900805F6FD6EE15EDF931@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Klotz, Leigh wrote:
>From: ari@c... [mailto:ari@c...] 
>>Speaking of browsers, is there a good reason they only support GET and
>>POST? I mean the HTML DTD only has these two as legal values for the
>>method attribute on FORM, but is there a reason for that?
> 
> XForms-compliant browsers [1] support a variety of submission methods,
> including HTTP PUT, and XForms allows for extensions in the value of
> submission method attribute.

And SVG 1.2 is likely to add support for more than GET and POST, at 
least PUT in order to properly host XForms and possibly others.

-- 
Robin Berjon

• References:
  • RE: A question about REST and transaction isolation
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Next by Date: xsd to xml
• Previous by thread: RE: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Next by thread: RE: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread